[Kabar-Irian] Irian News - 3/10/03
Admin
admin at irja.org
Mon Mar 10 18:15:15 MST 2003
- Theys' widow wants death sentence or life for men on trial
- Papuas chiefs proposed splitting the Indonesian province into seven
autonomous regions
- Papuans protest new provinces
- A Papuan free for all
- PNG government warned to respect the OPM
- Forces to be reckoned with
- Jakarta due to complain to Australian delegation over alleged support of
Papuan separatists
- BP, World Bank Discuss Loan For Indonesian Development
*****************************
From: "Tapol" <tapol at gn.apc.org>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: [wp] Theys' widow wants death sentence or life for men on trial
The widow of They Eluay, the pro-independence Papuan leader who was murdered in
November 2001, has described the prosecutor's demand for two or three years
from the men now on trial for her husband's murder as 'unbelievable'. She said,
as reported in Cendrawasih Pos of 10 March, that the family could never accept
that the men had only be charged with maltreatment, leading to loss of life.
The killing was clearly premeditated.
The trial of seven members of Kopassus is now under way in Surabaya before a
military court. At a session last week, the prosecutors asked the court to
sentence the men to two and three years sentences.
She said that the trial had been engineered for show. If they had only wanted
to kidnap him, she said, he would have been hidden in a safe place. They knew
all about his movements and actions as the leader of the Papuan people, 'This
crime was clearly committed for state interests. It could not have been an act
carried out on the initiative of individuals.'
'My husband was clearly horribly tortured and killed sadistically,' she said.
But his killing is being treated as if it were an ordinary crime. As far as we
are concerned, the men should be sentenced to death or to life imprisonment,'
she said.
Her husband had never, throughout his life, used violence against anyone and we
often welcomed these Kopassus members to our home, and yet this is how they
repaid our friendship.
She denied that she and others in her family had refused to go to Surabaya to
testify in court as witnesses because they were afraid for their security.
She said the problem was they did not know who would cover the costs for the
trip to Surabaya. Also, she said that it would have been difficult for her to
face the murderers of her husband.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Radio New Zealand International
Created at 5:00 pm on 10 March 2003
Papuas chiefs proposed splitting the Indonesian province into seven autonomous
regions
Papuas customary or chiefly council will meet with the Indonesian government
to discuss an alternative to President Megawati Sukarnoputris controversial
decision to split the province into three.
Council member, Franz Albert Joku says next weeks meeting will discuss the
possibility of dividing Papua into seven autonomous regions, similar to what
existed during the Dutch colonial days.
President Sukarnoputri ordered the division saying the province was too big for
one governor to administer.
Her decision is seen as conflicting with the Governments earlier decision on
special autonomy for the province.
Mr Joku says Jakartas plan fails to take into account customary land
ownership, ethnic composition and demography.
The main driving force behind all these decisions is the greater empowerment
and also recognize the distinct diverse indigenous groups spread across West
Papua and to empower them by ensuring people have access over their land, have
access over their forests, rivers so on the right of ownership over what is
rightfully ours --Franz Albert Joku in Papua.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Jakarta Post.com
Across the Archipelago
March 11, 2003
Papuans protest new provinces
Jayapura, Papua: A crowd of some 100 students demonstrated on Monday before the
provincial legislature against Jakarta's move to split Papua into three
provinces, arguing it would attract more migrants to the natural resources-
rich, yet sparely populated region.
Calling themselves the Mid-Mountain People's Care Forum, the protesters, mostly
students, argued that dividing Papua in three provinces benefited Jakarta but
would harm locals.
They feared an influx of migrants, reasoning Papuans were unlikely to fill all
the new posts needed to run the two new provincial governments.
Locals have long complained about discrimination by migrants since the region
came under Indonesian rule during the 1960s.
Poverty and unemployment remains a problem in Papua despite its advanced
exploitation of natural resources. As education has been lacking, most of the
higher-paid jobs have been filled by outsiders.
Monday's rally was the third since President Megawati Soekarnoputri approved
the addition of two new provinces to Papua last January.
The move is aimed to bring better public services to the 2.4 million Papuans
who live in a region about three times the size of Java.
-- JP
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sydney Morning Herald
A Papuan free for all
March 11 2003
-- An independence movement in the Indonesian province of Papua threatens to
turn into a humanitarian disaster and bring new tensions to the fragile ties
between Canberra and Jakarta. Craig Skehan reports.
Despite its natural splendours, cultural diversity and tragic history of
decolonisation gone awry, Papua has not loomed large in world or regional
affairs. But that's about to change. Papua has the potential to become as
explosive an issue between Australia and Indonesia as East Timor.
Indeed, when John Howard was in Jakarta late last month, Indonesia's President,
Megawati Soekarnoputri, told him that pro-Papuan independence activists in
Australia were "hampering" the bilateral relationship.
Today, the issue of Papua is expected to be raised at an Australian-Indonesian
ministerial meeting, and Indonesia has already flagged concern about Australian
non-government organisations (NGOs) advocating independence for Papua.
"We know the Australian Government's view in support of our territorial
integrity," said a spokesman for Indonesia's foreign affairs ministry, Marty
Natalegawa. "At the same time we will make known our concern not to allow
certain groups under the guise of democracy, free speech and the like basically
to try to disrupt and disturb our national unity which we will defend, as would
any other sovereign country."
Universities and colleges, NGOs and churches in Australia are all raising the
level of public consciousness on our oft forgotten neighbour, formerly known as
Irian Jaya. And a new book published in Australia, West Papua - Follow the
Morning Star, detailing the history of Papua's long and bloody campaign for
nationhood, opens a window on this mountainous land.
Pro-independence guerillas wearing penis gourds and traditional decorations
peer out from these pages, some with the word "Merdeka", freedom, painted on
their bodies.
In a preface to the book, the Papuan human rights activist John Rumbiak cites
investigations which put the number of Papuans who have died during 40 years of
resisting Indonesian rule at 100,000.
"In the face of so much suffering, Papuans have committed themselves to
pursuing a peaceful movement towards their goal; freedom," Rumbiak writes in
the preface. "It is a struggle for everyone living or who will ever live in
Papua."
The launch of the book two weeks ago, by Liz Thompson, Jim Elmslie and Ben
Bohane, coincided with a Melbourne seminar on Papua and a fundraising concert.
The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology has come under fire for pulling out
as the seminar venue.
As well as a veiled Indonesian Government threat that the large number of
Indonesian students studying at the institute could be withdrawn, seminar
organisers believe there was behind-the-scenes pressure from Canberra.
The Indonesian Government also signalled displeasure at Australian Government
funds going to aid organisations which it accuses of actively supporting Papuan
independence.
In light of the bitter diplomatic breach that followed Canberra's belated
support for an act of self-determination in East Timor, the Australian
Government is trying to avoid a similar conflict in Papua.
But many of the same Indonesian military officers accused of creating and
directing violent anti-independence militia in East Timor have now been
deployed in Papua.
The Foreign Minister, Alexander Downer, argues that the international community
has no room to move because whereas East Timor was formerly a Portuguese
colony, Papua was part of the wider Dutch colony which became the Republic of
Indonesia.
Australian public opinion forced the Howard Government to drop its longstanding
acceptance of Indonesia's invasion and incorporation of East Timor. It is yet
to be seen whether so many Australians will come to feel as passionately about
Papua as they did about East Timor.
However, events in the western half of the island of New Guinea are already
demanding greater public attention and engendering humanitarian concern.
The arrival of thousands of Islamic militants - mostly in the form of the
Laskar Jihad among Muslim Indonesian migrants to the province - is one portent
of trouble ahead. More serious still is growing evidence indicating that some
elements of the Indonesian military are backing the jihadists, including
through training at camps along the rugged border with Papua New Guinea.
Senior officials in the Howard Government acknowledge that there are "informal"
links, but a number of regional analysts point to high-level Indonesian
military sanctioning of the Laskar Jihad and other militias in Papua.
Among the prime suspects in terms of such involvement are members of
Indonesia's Kopassus special forces.
Despite such concerns, the Australian Government is renewing aid and other ties
to Kopassus which were severed following gross human rights abuses by the elite
force in East Timor during 1999.
The Australian Government, in the wake of the October 12 Bali bombings and
wider fears over al-Qaeda-linked groups using the Indonesian archipelago to
stage further terrorist attacks, is clearly worried about developments in Papua.
For example, there is the prospect that an Indonesian military crackdown on
dissent, which has already involved summary killings, will intensify while the
world is preoccupied with the looming war against Iraq.
And extremists, or military-backed agent provocateurs, have already
demonstrated a readiness to incite communal strife elsewhere in Indonesia by
such underhand methods as setting fire to churches or mosques.
Given past experience, it could be corrupt elements of the military - seeking
to retain control of lucrative illegal logging operations or extortion rackets
involving big mining projects - who provoke unrest in order to justify the
crushing of dissent.
Given that some 40 per cent of Papua's more than 2 million population consists
of non-Papuans, mainly Muslim migrants from elsewhere in Indonesia, amid a
Christian and animist majority, scope for widespread communal conflict is real.
Downer has on a number of occasions warned about the risk of a "bloodbath" in
the Indonesian province if there is outside support for the independence
campaign which has waxed and waned since the 1960s. Specifically, he has
pointed to a danger of "civil war".
The Howard Government advocates continued international acceptance of
Indonesian sovereignty in Papua, a recognition of Jakarta's insistence that the
republic not be allowed to fracture into micro-states.
During a recent sweep through the South Pacific, Downer strongly cautioned
Vanuatu against going ahead with a plan to allow the opening of a West Papuan
representative office in its capital, Port Vila, this month.
Australia has also worked behind the scenes, not always successfully, to
prevent Papuan activists from being included in several national delegations at
the annual Pacific Islands Forum gathering.
In the past, Australia has pressed concerns on Jakarta's behalf with Papua New
Guinea, even relaying requests for Indonesian troops to be allowed to cross
over the border in "hot pursuit" of rebels.
With continuing pockets of popular support for Papuan independence in PNG,
especially in border areas, Port Moresby has been squeezed by local
sensitivities as well as by Jakarta and Canberra.
The PNG Government recently expressed fears that Islamic extremist militia in
Papua could use the province as a base to strike Australian targets on the PNG
side of the border.
In an attempt to avoid tensions with Indonesia, PNG has said this month it will
repatriate more than 300 Papuans who have been at a refugee camp near the dusty
border town of Vanimo for more than two years.
As happened when more than 10,000 Papuans crossed into PNG in the 1980s, the
Catholic Church has come out strongly against such repatriations, to the
annoyance of the Indonesian Government.
On the Papuan side of the border, there has been an Indonesian troop build-up
during the past year or so from about 4,000 to more than 5,000 soldiers.
Professor Ron May, a regional specialist at the Australian National University
in Canberra, told the Herald that after a period of attempting to pursue
dialogue, Indonesian authorities had switched to a major crackdown on
dissidents.
"If they put the lid on a boiling cauldron like that, there will be a point
when the lid will blow," May said.
He said Australia needed to engage in open discussion about the problems and
future of Papua, adding that other academic institutions should not follow the
RMIT and bow to outside pressure. Likewise, he said the Australian Government
should not attempt to curb academic freedoms in order to appease Jakarta.
Rumbiak, who is from the Papuan human rights group ELSHAM, says that rather
than focusing on the danger of civil war, Downer should urge Indonesia to enter
into meaningful talks with Papuan leaders.
"We are talking about a wise proposal that would take into account the
interests of Papuans, Jakarta and the international community, including
Australia," he said.
As well as discussion of Indonesia's plans to implement a package providing for
greater autonomy, the issue of full independence would remain a "crucial
question" to be addressed.
While a major pro-independence body, the Papua Council Presidium, has called
for a "zone of peace" in Papua, there are elements of the Free Papua Movement
(OPM) in remote hideouts who continue to call for more guns to pursue an armed
struggle.
"That is because of frustration due to the international community remaining
silent on the need for dialogue," Mr Rumbiak explained.
He added that it was clear that Australian communications intercepts in Papua,
as well as intelligence information shared with Canberra by the United States,
were providing evidence of human rights violations and links between the
military and anti-independence militia (see breakout).
"As a member of the United Nations, Australia should not stay quiet - it should
take such material to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights,"
Rumbiak said.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The National (PNG)
Monday, 10 March 2003
PNG government warned to respect the OPM
West Papua National Congress Chairman Michael Kareth has called on the
Government of Papua New Guinea to be careful about human rights violations on
its common border with Indonesia.
Mr Kareth, in a statement last week, said this following news that the PNG
Government has given directions for troops to clean up the hideouts of the OPM
along the PNG side of the border.
He said: We have been fighting for the last 40 years since 1969 because we are
dealing with an arrogant, undemocratic and repressive Government that is not
prepared to give up its stranglehold on West Papua because of the rich natural
resource wealth.
He said nothing that the PNG government did would stifle the efforts of the OPM
to gain self-government and independence.
He said the desire would burn anew within the hearts of the sympathizers along
the border.
He said that OPM was a buffer force keeping Indonesia away from the South
Pacific, especially PNG and Australia and said PNG owed its quiet border to
the bow and arrow army of West Papua. Mr Kareth said that the Police and the
Defence must be humanitarian and considerate in their efforts along the border.
In a related issue, the former Governor of Sandaun John Tekwie warned the
Government not to fall prey to the smiling policy of Indonesia.
Mr Tekwie said that the West Papua problem was no longer an internal matter for
Indonesia.
He said that PNG must admit to Jakarta that the border issue is now an
international issue warranting United Nations intervention.
Meanwhile, Moresby North East MP, Caspar Wollom has called on the government to
stop Indonesian troops terrorizing the people of PNG under the pretext of
looking for OPM rebels.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sydney Morning Herald
Forces to be reckoned with
March 11 2003
-- Islamic militants and Papuan militia are massing on the border between Papua
and PNG, writes John Martinkus.
Forty kilometres from the Papuan capital of Jayapura, its border with PNG has
become a no-go area for Indonesian police and human rights workers - and home
to Kopassus-run training camps for Laskar Jihad Islamic militants and Papuan
militia.
Lawrence Mehui, from the pro-independence Papuan Presidium Council,
says that since November Kopassus has been recruiting villagers. In January it
began recruiting people in the large transmigrant settlements around Arso,
south of Jayapura. "There is a direct connection between the Islamic groups and
the military because all the weapons used are military standard," he says.
Johannes Bonay, the director of Elsham, Papua's only functioning human rights
organisation, confirms that the situation has deteriorated.
Bonay's wife and daughter were seriously wounded on December 28 when the car in
which they were travelling was ambushed by unidentified gunmen between the
border posts of Papua and PNG. An Indonesian police investigation team was also
shot at and forced to leave.
The preliminary police investigation has identified Indonesian military as
being present when the shooting occurred. "If we analyse the reports made by
the people and the investigation made by the police we can divine that Kopassus
is behind this," says Bonay.
Death threats against Papuan leaders have become common. Thom Beanal, the
successor to the Kopassus-slain Papuan Presidium Council leader, Theys Eluay,
says, "We are getting used to the intimidation now. We get SMS all the time
saying that we will be killed."
The Kopassus operations extend to anyone they believe is linked to the
independence movement. Last October a tour guide was abducted by seven Kopassus
members at Jayapura's main airport in Sentani. He was kept in a small room at
Kopassus headquarters and given nothing but salt water for 14 days. Deep,
barely healed scars cross his back where he was sliced with a bayonet. His
interrogators accused him of having links with the Free Papua Movement, OPM. He
said that as they were doing this, they said, "You cannot get independence.
During 2003, 2004 we will kill all Papuan leaders for independence."
Last week the Jayapura daily, Cenderawasih Post, reported all 250 Kopassus
personnel were withdrawing from Papua, but most believe it is a standard troop
rotation.
Elsham was among the first to blame the military for the ambush on August 31
last year that killed two Americans and one Indonesian, employees of the
Freeport gold and copper mine. It has also tracked the arrival of Laskar Jihad
in Papua over the past two years, which began in the coastal town of Sorong
where 12 training camps, guarded by the military, were identified.
Sorong is nine hours by boat from Ambon and as the sectarian conflict there
subsided last year 3000 Laskar Jihad members were reported to have arrived.
Last month a Pakistani national was arrested by Indonesian police in Sorong in
possession of 10 explosive devices. The arrest was just one in a string of
discoveries of weapons and explosive devices there that began in 2001 when
Laskar Jihad fighters arrived.
The establishment of Laskar Jihad and militia training camps on the border has
increased clashes with OPM fighters.
A PNG police operation was carried out on January 29 to ensure OPM fighters
were not using PNG territory as a base. The operation reported the camps on the
PNG side of the border had been vacated and the leader, Mathias Wenda, has not
been seen since.
-- John Martinkus is a freelance journalist and writer who has reported
extensively on Indonesia and East Timor.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Radio New Zealand International
Created at 12:51 am on 10 March 2003
Jakarta due to complain to Australian delegation over alleged support of Papuan
separatists
Officials in Indonesia are due to complain to a delegation of Australian
ministers this week over what they say is Canberras support for the Papuan
separatist movement.
Jakarta says that Australia is favouring Papuan separatists over other
Indonesians when issuing visas.
The Australian Associated Press says Canberra had backed a move by Jakarata to
give the province of Papua more autonomy.
The Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, supported the measure as a way of
satisfying the aspirations of the Papuan people and helping to stop any further
breakup of Indonesia into tiny, unstable states.
But Indonesias President, Megawati Sukarnoputri, now supports plans which
would see the province being broken up into three.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Wall Street Journal (via Joyo Indonesia News)
March 10, 2003
BP, World Bank Discuss Loan For Indonesian Development
By Timothy Mapes
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal
Jakarta, Indonesia -- BP PLC and the World Bank are discussing the possibility
of arranging an innovative loan to bring money for education, health and other
development programs to the remote Indonesian province of Papua, many years
before the British energy company's planned natural-gas facility is slated to
begin generating revenue there.
While the discussions are at an early stage, and no specific amounts for the
loan have been decided yet, the possible World Bank loan would effectively be
securitized by billions of dollars in expected tax revenue and royalty payments
from BP's planned Tangguh natural-gas project, allowing Papua to begin to
increase its spending on social-development programs well before the project
comes on line.
"It's an idea at this stage. But I think it's a good idea," said Bert Hofman,
the World Bank's chief economist in Jakarta. He added, however, that
discussions with the government of Indonesia still need to be conducted to
determine whether such a loan would fit with the government's plans to reduce
its overall foreign borrowing over time.
BP's $2 billion Tangguh natural-gas project is Indonesia's largest new
investment, and BP wants it to become a model commercial project in the
developing world. But in seeking to bring social benefits to Papua --
Indonesia's least-developed province -- the company has been hampered by long
project-development cycles and some setbacks related to supply contracts.
Although construction is slated to begin next year, the company currently
expects that the project isn't likely to begin generating significant revenue
for Papua until approximately 2011.
Given that delay, an independent assessment of the Tangguh project commissioned
by BP recommended last week that BP try to arrange a bridging loan for Papua so
that local people begin to see substantive benefits from the project in the
near future, and will thus be more inclined to support it. It added that such a
move could be even more important in light of recent setbacks in negotiations
with potential buyers, such as a decision last year by China's National
Offshore Oil Corp. to accept a smaller amount of gas than BP had hoped to
supply.
The assessment also argued that if funds are disbursed by an international
lending institution, there can be more oversight to assure that they will
actually be spent on the required facilities and "are not being wasted, or
worse, diverted through ineffective or corrupt local governments."
In a statement, BP said it had explained to all affected parties that there
could be some delays in getting revenue from its gas sales to local
governments, and said a special loan might be a good response to the situation.
"BP agrees that an externally financed line of credit to Papua would bring many
benefits. However, this is a decision between Papua and the government of
Indonesia," the company said.
BP estimates that the project could generate some $12 billion in total revenue
for central and Papua governments over the next 30 years. It has also noted
that when revenues reach their peak, between 2011 and 2022, the government of
Papua itself is likely to receive approximately $225 million annually, or more
than Papua's current total budget of $190 million.
The World Bank has previously warned Indonesia to keep a tight control on
borrowing by its newly empowered provincial governments, and not to issue new
debt that is securitized by revenue streams generated by a variety of resource
projects in the country.
But Mr. Hofman noted that the potential loan for Papua could be structured to
work around those concerns. For one, all World Bank loans are made directly to
the central government, which in turn would then hand over the proceeds to the
provincial government of Papua. As a result, the loan would dodge concerns
about unrestrained and uncontrolled borrowings by provincial governments.
Previous efforts by Indonesia to sell securitized debt in world markets were
also viewed by the World Bank and other observers as a possible way for the
country to avoid having to submit to the discipline of an International
Monetary Fund program. But with the World Bank itself participating in a
potential loan for Papua and Indonesia's IMF program due to end later this year
in any case, such concerns would be substantively diminished.
-- Write to Timothy Mapes at tim.mapes at awsj.com
More information about the Kabar-Irian
mailing list